ArticleAsian bioethics review2026
A Qualitative Comparative Study of the Doctor-Patient Relationship Model and Decision-Making Style among Chinese and Japanese Doctors.
Article in Asian bioethics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Causes of medical disputes in China and Japan from physicians' perspectives: a qualitative study.Frontiers in health services · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The nature of doctor-patient relationships (DPRs) and decision-making style (DMS) is related to patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and the occurrence of disputes. Given the importance of understanding the current state of DPRs, we conducted an exploratory analysis of the current state of DPRs and DMS in clinical settings in China and Japan. We explored similarities and differences between the two countries, as well as influential factors in DPRs and DMS. Twenty doctors in China and 20 doctors in Japan were recruited through the authors' personal networks as well as snowball sampling, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Doctors were asked about mainstream DPR models and DMS in current medical practice, and their responses were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Results of the analysis suggest that, in both China and Japan, a diverse mosaic of DPRs and DMS coexists. In both countries, there are paternalistic relationships between doctors and patients, as well as teacher-and-student relationships, but there are also cases in which patients make final decisions and those which adopt shared decision-making. Some doctors referred to DPRs as a friendship. Furthermore, attitudes of individual doctors and patients, the medical environment, trust between the two parties, and national and cultural characteristics strongly impact the formation of DPRs. Our findings highlight the importance of carefully monitoring the current state and various influencing factors of DPRs in order to realize effective human relationships in clinical settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.