Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434111›Full record

ArticleAsian bioethics review2026

A Qualitative Comparative Study of the Doctor-Patient Relationship Model and Decision-Making Style among Chinese and Japanese Doctors.

Hua Xu, Taketoshi Okita, Masao Tabata, Atsushi Asai

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Asian bioethics review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Hua XuDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Miyagi Prefecture Japan.
Taketoshi OkitaDivision of Philosophy and Ethics, Department of Culture and Medicine, School of Medicine, Shiga University of Medical Science, Otsu, Japan.
Masao TabataPatient Safety Management Office, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Atsushi AsaiDepartment of Medical Ethics, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The nature of doctor-patient relationships (DPRs) and decision-making style (DMS) is related to patient satisfaction, clinical outcomes, and the occurrence of disputes. Given the importance of understanding the current state of DPRs, we conducted an exploratory analysis of the current state of DPRs and DMS in clinical settings in China and Japan. We explored similarities and differences between the two countries, as well as influential factors in DPRs and DMS. Twenty doctors in China and 20 doctors in Japan were recruited through the authors' personal networks as well as snowball sampling, and semi-structured interviews were conducted. Doctors were asked about mainstream DPR models and DMS in current medical practice, and their responses were analyzed using qualitative descriptive methods. Results of the analysis suggest that, in both China and Japan, a diverse mosaic of DPRs and DMS coexists. In both countries, there are paternalistic relationships between doctors and patients, as well as teacher-and-student relationships, but there are also cases in which patients make final decisions and those which adopt shared decision-making. Some doctors referred to DPRs as a friendship. Furthermore, attitudes of individual doctors and patients, the medical environment, trust between the two parties, and national and cultural characteristics strongly impact the formation of DPRs. Our findings highlight the importance of carefully monitoring the current state and various influencing factors of DPRs in order to realize effective human relationships in clinical settings.

Indexed as

China,Cross-cultural comparison,Decision-making style,Doctor-patient relationship,JapanQualitative descriptive analysis,

Identifiers

PMID42434111
PMCPMC13350565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.