ArticleNeuroimage. Reports2026
Accelerated brain aging in Veterans with posttraumatic stress symptoms and mild traumatic brain injury.
Article in Neuroimage. Reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Exposure to trauma and mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI), which often co-occur and can both trigger acute and chronic pathophysiological processes, have been linked to brain changes indicative of accelerated neurological aging. However, few longitudinal studies have examined the impact of these factors over time or characterized how the chronicity and severity of associated symptoms affect aging trajectories. This study included individuals (N = 79) who were exposed to psychological trauma, with most of the cohort additionally having sustained a mTBI. Participants completed structural MRI scans and behavioral assessments during three study visits over 18 months at nine-month intervals. Utilizing a deep learning method (DeepBrainNet), brain age was estimated using a large, published, normative sample and compared against chronological age. Associations between resultant brain age and neurobehavioral symptoms over time were also examined. Findings revealed that predicted brain age was significantly older (i.e., 4.8 years) than chronological age at baseline (p < 0.0001). This brain age gap progressively widened over the course of evaluation, with a difference of 5.4 and 6.5 years at 9 and 18 months post-baseline, respectively. Participants reported mild to moderate posttraumatic stress disorder, depressive, neurobehavioral, and postconcussive symptoms, which remained stable and were not correlated with the accelerated rate of brain aging. The duration since trauma exposure did not significantly influence the rate of neurological aging. Results suggest that the experience of trauma, and the confluence of factors that frequently co-occur with trauma, have a profound impact on brain health.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.