Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434089›Full record

ArticleVeterinary and animal science2026

Microbiota shows major difference in case of two shorebird species with different feeding strategy.

Ákos Őrsi, Levente Laczkó, Renáta Bőkényné Tóth, Csongor Freytag, Pál Tóth, Gábor Simay, Nándor Szabó, Gábor Kardos, Ádám Lovas-Kiss

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Veterinary and animal science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ákos ŐrsiMTA-HUN-REN-Centre for Ecological Research "Momentum" Lendület Dispersal Ecology Research Group, Debrecen, Hungary.
Levente LaczkóDepartment of Bioinformatics, "One Health" Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032. Debrecen, Hungary.
Renáta Bőkényné TóthDepartment of Infection Control and Hospital Epidemiology, "One Health" Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032, Debrecen, Hungary.
Csongor FreytagDepartment of Bioinformatics, "One Health" Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032. Debrecen, Hungary.
Pál TóthMTA-HUN-REN-Centre for Ecological Research "Momentum" Lendület Dispersal Ecology Research Group, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gábor SimayMTA-HUN-REN-Centre for Ecological Research "Momentum" Lendület Dispersal Ecology Research Group, Debrecen, Hungary.
Nándor SzabóMTA-HUN-REN-Centre for Ecological Research "Momentum" Lendület Dispersal Ecology Research Group, Debrecen, Hungary.
Gábor KardosDepartment of Planetary Health, "One Health" Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Debrecen, Egyetem tér 1, 4032 Debrecen, Hungary.
Ádám Lovas-KissMTA-HUN-REN-Centre for Ecological Research "Momentum" Lendület Dispersal Ecology Research Group, Debrecen, Hungary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the well-known effects of the gut microbiota on mammals, other vertebrates have only recently begun receiving attention in research. Our study focused on describing the cloacal microbiome of Common Snipe (

Indexed as

16S rRNA geneBird migrationFusobacteriaMicrobiomePathogensShorebirdWaterbird

Identifiers

PMID42434089
PMCPMC13351446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.