ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2026
Superb Microvascular Imaging-Enhanced Lymphatic Ultrasound for Preoperative Mapping in Lymphedema-related Lymphaticovenular Anastomosis.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accurate preoperative identification of functional lymphatic vessels and veins is essential for successful lymphaticovenular anastomosis (LVA). Conventional Doppler-based ultrasonography (D-CUPS [Doppler, cross, uncollapsible, parallel, superficial fascia]) may produce motion-related artifacts that complicate lymphatic-venous discrimination. This study compares examination time and examiner burden between a superb microvascular imaging-based method (S-CUPS) and D-CUPS for preoperative LVA mapping. Methods: Twenty patients with primary or secondary lymphedema underwent both D-CUPS and S-CUPS in randomized order before LVA. In 36 limbs, 88 predefined scanning sites were evaluated. Per-site examination time, vessel depth and diameter, intraoperative NECST classification (normal, ectasis, contraction, sclerosis), and examiner fatigue using a 1-10 visual analog scale (VAS) were recorded. Linear mixed-effects models accounted for clustering of multiple sites within patients, and Spearman correlation analyses were performed for continuous variables. All ultrasound-identified veins and lymphatic vessels were confirmed intraoperatively. Results: S-CUPS shortened per-site examination time compared with D-CUPS (estimated marginal means, 51.7 versus 75.0 s; Conclusions: S-CUPS was associated with shorter per-site examination time and lower examiner-reported mental fatigue than D-CUPS in preoperative mapping for lymphedema-related LVA, although the modest magnitude of these differences warrants further validation in clinical practice.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.