ArticlePublic health weekly report2026
Surveillance for Unreported Vector-borne Viruses in the Republic of Korea, 2023-2025.
Article in Public health weekly report, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study aims to detect unreported vector-borne pathogens with the potential for introduction into the Republic of Korea (ROK) owing to climate change and increasing international travel and to evaluate the need for proactive surveillance strategies that address gaps in existing surveillance systems. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted using 5,674 clinical samples collected between 2023 and 2025 from patients with suspected vector-borne infections who tested negative for nationally notifiable vector-borne diseases. Ten candidate pathogens were selected based on their occurrence in neighboring countries and their potential for transmission by vectors present in the ROK. A stepwise analytical workflow was applied, encompassing quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)-based screening, followed by Sanger sequencing and phylogenetic analysis. Results: Among the 5,674 samples, two cases of tick-borne Oz virus infection were identified, while the remaining nine target pathogens were not detected. One case was classified as an imported infection based on documented travel to Japan and a confirmed history of tick exposure. The second case occurred in a patient without international travel history, suggesting the potential presence of Oz virus within the domestic environment. Conclusions: This study identified evidence of potential importation and possible domestic transmission of previously unrecognized pathogens that had not been detected through existing surveillance system. The findings highlight the need to strengthen vector and wildlife surveillance, expand molecular diagnostic capacity, and establish an integrated One Health surveillance framework to improve early detection and response to emerging infectious diseases not currently included in routine surveillance programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.