ArticleSkin appendage disorders2026
Additive Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma and Systemic Therapies in Androgenetic Alopecia: A Retrospective Study.
Article in Skin appendage disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Established treatments for androgenetic alopecia (AGA) include low-dose oral minoxidil (LDOM), spironolactone, finasteride, dutasteride, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP). While PRP is often combined with topical minoxidil, studies on its use with systemic agents are limited. This study compares trichometric outcomes and side effects between PRP monotherapy and PRP plus systemic therapy. Methods: An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted of NYU AGA patients treated between 11/1/17 and 8/1/25. Changes in hair density (hairs/cm Results: Fifty-five patients met inclusion criteria (65.5% female, mean age 49). Compared to monotherapy ( Conclusions: Combination therapy showed numerically higher but statistically nonsignificant improvements without increased adverse effects. These findings support further prospective studies to optimize combination regimens and patient selection by AGA severity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.