ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
Masking ability of layering techniques combined with white or yellow opaquers on a dark background.
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Clinicians still experience hesitation and uncertainty regarding the techniques required to achieve the appropriate final color for clinical cases involving discolored teeth, and it is often unclear whether a white or yellow opaque shade should be applied. This study evaluated the influence of resin composite (RC) layering techniques, using either regular or flowable opaques in white and yellow shades, on the masking ability of a discolored substrate. Materials and Methods: Acrylic upper left central incisors, shade C3, with veneer preparations were divided into 11 groups (n=5). Shade C3 (n=5) and shade A1 (n=5) intact acrylic teeth were the negative and positive control groups, respectively. Teeth were restored with the monolayer, bilayer or trilayer technique, and white or yellow opaques were associated with dentin RC and/or enamel RC. E00 values were obtained using the CIEDE2000 formula. Data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis and Dunn's test (=5%). Results: Groups restored with the trilayer technique (opaque + dentin RC + enamel RC) obtained significantly lower E00 values, below the acceptability threshold. In the trilayer technique, the use of white regular opaque (1.18) did not differ significantly from the positive control (0.69) (p>0.05). The use of yellow opaques increased E00, but it remained below the acceptability threshold. Conclusions: The trilayer technique using white or yellow opaques, dentin, and enamel RCs yielded E00 values below the acceptability threshold. However, white opaques were more effective in masking the discolored background.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.