ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026
Are flowable composite resins containing bioactive particles truly biocompatible?
Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: To evaluate the degree of conversion and biocompatibility of flowable composite resins containing bioactive particles using in vitro and in vivo models, respectively. Materials and Methods: The flowable composite resins Beautifil Flow Plus F00 (F00), Beautifil Flow Plus F03 (F03), and Filtek Supreme (FS) were tested. For the degree of conversion (DC) test, seven specimens were prepared for each group and analyzed using Raman spectroscopy. For biocompatibility (BC), seven specimens from each group were implanted into the dorsal subcutaneous tissue of 21 female Wistar rats, which were divided into three groups according to the experimental periods of 7, 14, and 28 days. After euthanasia, the dorsal tissues were surgically excised, fixed in formalin solution, and processed for histological analysis. The slides were evaluated blindly, and ten microscopic fields were randomly selected at 400× magnification. Statistical analysis for DC and BC was performed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, followed by Tukey's post hoc test for DC and Dunn's test for BC. Results: For BC, F00 and F03 induced less inflammation and granulation tissue formation and promoted greater fibrosis than FS (p < 0.05). For DC, no statistically significant difference was observed among the groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Flowable bioactive composite resins represent promising alternatives for dental practice, as they induce minimal tissue inflammation and exhibit high conversion rates.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.