Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434024›Full record

ReviewJournal of clinical and experimental dentistry2026

Ultrasonic Cavity Preparation with CVD Diamond Tips: A Scanning Electron Microscopy Study of Dentin Surface Morphology and Smear Layer Formation.

Mauricio Schneider, Jefferson David Melo de Matos, Mário Alexandre Coelho Sinhoreti, Diego Telomaro Peiter, José Eduardo Bastian, Daher Antonio Queiroz

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of clinical and experimental dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Mauricio SchneiderDDS, MS, Assistant Professor, Department of Prosthodontics, Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.
Jefferson David Melo de MatosPhD, Department of Biomaterials, Dental Materials and Prosthodontics, São Paulo State University (Unesp), Institute of Science and Technology, São José dos Campos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Mário Alexandre Coelho SinhoretiProfessor, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Dental Materials Division, Piracicaba Dental School (FOP UNICAMP), Piracicaba, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Diego Telomaro PeiterDDS, Department of Dentistry Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Torres, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
José Eduardo BastianDDS, Department of Dentistry Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Torres, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
Daher Antonio QueirozDDS, MS, PhD, Associate Professor, Department of Restorative Sciences and Public Health Dentistry, Nova Southeastern University College of Dental Medicine, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Minimally invasive dentistry has driven the development of alternative cavity preparation techniques aimed at preserving tooth structure and improving biological outcomes. Ultrasonic systems associated with chemical vapor deposition (CVD) diamond tips have emerged as a potential alternative to conventional rotary instruments; however, evidence regarding their effects on dentin surface morphology and smear layer characteristics under SEM remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate the morphological characteristics of dentin surfaces after cavity preparation using ultrasonic and conventional rotary techniques. Materials and Methods: Twenty extracted human teeth were sectioned longitudinally to obtain standardized specimens. Samples were assigned to ultrasonic preparation using CVD diamond tips or conventional rotary preparation using carbide burs at high and low speeds. After preparation, specimens were cleaned, stored in distilled water, sputter-coated, and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Surface morphology, smear layer presence, and dentinal tubule exposure were qualitatively assessed at different magnifications. Results: Ultrasonic preparation resulted in consistently cleaner dentin surfaces with minimal smear layer and open dentinal tubules, whereas conventional rotary instrumentation produced irregular surfaces covered by dense smear layer and debris. Conclusions: Ultrasonic cavity preparation using CVD diamond tips demonstrated superior surface characteristics compared with conventional rotary techniques, supporting its potential as a minimally invasive approach that may enhance adhesion and preserve dentin-pulp integrity.

Identifiers

PMID42434024
PMCPMC13353929

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.