ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Diagnostic complexity and potentially avoidable invasive procedures before the recognition of pneumoconiosis.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pneumoconiosis remains a major occupational health problem worldwide and is frequently initially mistaken for malignancy or infection due to overlapping radiological features. This diagnostic uncertainty may lead to unnecessary invasive procedures, increasing both patient risk and healthcare burden. However, data on how occupational exposure and imaging findings influence diagnostic pathways remain limited. Methods: In this retrospective single-center study, we evaluated 121 patients with pneumoconiosis who had undergone invasive diagnostic procedures before pneumoconiosis was considered (2021-2025), representing a population with increased diagnostic complexity. We examined occupational exposure, radiological phenotypes, diagnostic decision-making, and procedure-related outcomes. In these patients, in whom pneumoconiosis had not been considered as a preliminary diagnosis, diagnostic concordance was defined as confirmation of the leading preprocedural working diagnosis by invasive findings. Results: Radiological patterns commonly associated with malignancy or infection were strongly linked to invasive diagnostic procedures. Higher radiological burden was associated with reduced pulmonary function ( Conclusion: In patients with occupational dust exposure, radiological misinterpretation may contribute to unnecessary invasive diagnostic procedures. Integrating occupational history into early diagnostic evaluation may reduce procedural burden and improve patient safety. These findings highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary and exposure-oriented approach in the management of suspected pneumoconiosis within public health frameworks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.