Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42434000›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026

Moral courage efficacy among medical students: associations with environmental professionalism, empathy attitudes, and communication self-efficacy.

Keren Michael, Nick Farajev, Orit Karnieli-Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Keren Michael *Department of Human Services, Department of Social Work, Community Health Promotion Research Center, The Max Stern Yezreel Valley College, Yezreel Valley, Israel.
Nick Farajev *Department of Medical Education, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Dr. Sol Amsterdam Dr. David P. Schumann Chair in Medical Education, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Orit Karnieli-MillerDepartment of Medical Education, Gray Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, Tel Aviv University, Dr. Sol Amsterdam Dr. David P. Schumann Chair in Medical Education, Tel Aviv, Israel.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Moral courage efficacy is the belief in one's perceived ability to take an active stand or action in the face of others- and self-wrongdoing or moral injustice, despite a risk of negative consequences. Although moral courage is important for enhancing patient safety and quality of care, there is limited research on moral courage efficacy and its environmental and personal contributing factors to guide educational interventions. The current study examined the complex relationships between environmental professionalism, empathy attitudes, communication self-efficacy, and moral courage efficacy. Methods: The sample included 178 clinical medical students who had completed online self-reported questionnaires. Data were analyzed via Pearson's correlation tests and Hayes's regression-based PROCESS macro. Results: The study findings showed that environmental professionalism was directly associated with moral courage efficacy toward others ( Conclusion: The findings highlight the need for educational interventions to focus on organizational (environmental) and personal (enhancing empathy and communication self-efficacy) levels to enhance moral courage efficacy. Intervening on both levels may help create a safer space, increased motivation, and perceived ability for students to disclose others' and their own wrongdoing, thus potentially promoting a safer and more moral medical environment.

Indexed as

communicationempathymoral courageprofessionalismself-efficacy

Identifiers

PMID42434000
PMCPMC13349757

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.