ArticleFrontiers in medicine2026
Training health care providers in abortion and sexual and reproductive rights: challenges and recommendations.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Persistent gaps remain in the training of physicians and midwives in sexual and reproductive health in Chile, despite overall advances in the field. These shortcomings affect equitable access to care and contribute to stigma surrounding sexual and reproductive rights. A multicenter study involving over 2,500 students and 57 professors from Chilean universities identified uneven curriculum implementation and disparities between secular and religious institutions. This policy brief proposes evidence-based interventions, including comprehensive sexuality education; integration of gender and human rights perspectives; explicit inclusion of abortion, conscientious objection, and confidentiality; incorporation of these topics into national assessment requirements; and strengthening faculty competencies. The proposed actions aim to improve healthcare quality and align with standards set by the WHO, FIGO, and other international organizations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.