ReviewFrontiers in medicine2026
Early mobilization to prevent ICU-acquired weakness in mechanically ventilated patients: an integrative review.
Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Intensive Care Unit-acquired weakness (ICU-AW) is a prevalent and serious complication in critically ill patients, leading to difficulty in weaning from mechanical ventilation, prolonged hospital stays, and impaired functional status after discharge. Aim: To retrieve, evaluate, and integrate the best evidence for preventing ICU-AW through early mobilization in mechanically ventilated patients, and to provide references for clinical practice. Methods: Following the "5S" pyramid model, a top-down, systematic retrieval was conducted across domestic and international databases. The types of literature encompass clinical decisions, guidelines, evidence summaries, best practices, expert consensus, group standards, and systematic reviews. Results: A total of 22 studies were included, comprising 1 evidence summary, 3 guidelines, 3 expert consensus statements, and 15 systematic reviews. 27 pieces of evidence were extracted from these articles, covering 9 areas: establishment of a multidisciplinary rehabilitation team, timing of mobilization, mobilization assessment, mobilization methods, frequency and intensity of exercise, pre-mobilization preparation, mobilization monitoring, post-mobilization observation, and precautions. Conclusion: This study presents key evidence on early mobilization to prevent ICU-AW in mechanically ventilated patients, highlighting its role in improving patient outcomes. Systematic assessment, timely initiation, individualized mobilization plans, progressive exercise protocols, continuous monitoring, and multidisciplinary collaboration are essential for the effective and safe implementation of mobilization. Early passive and active mobilization can reduce the incidence of ICU-AW, shorten ventilation and ICU stay, and improve functional status at discharge. Systematic review registration: http://ebn.nursing.fudan.edu.cn/registerResources, identifier ES20245841.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.