ReviewTranslational pediatrics2026
Current applications and future perspectives of family-integrated care in the pediatric intensive care unit: a narrative review from concept to practice.
Review in Translational pediatrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Family-integrated care (FIC), grounded in the principles of family-centered care (FCC), has become an important approach for supporting children and families during pediatric intensive care. Although post-intensive care syndrome in pediatrics (PICS-p) provides one important rationale for family engagement, the scope of FIC extends beyond PICS-p to include bedside participation, communication, shared decision-making, rehabilitation, psychosocial support, and transition planning. This narrative review aims to synthesize current applications, reported benefits, implementation barriers, and future priorities for FIC in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). Methods: We conducted a narrative review of literature on FIC/FCC in pediatric critical care. Searches were performed in PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library, with emphasis on contemporary literature from 2015 to April 2026 and inclusion of selected foundational papers when conceptually necessary. Eligible evidence included observational, qualitative, mixed-methods, quality-improvement, pre-post, interventional, guideline, and review literature relevant to family participation in PICU care. Key Content and Findings: The review identifies several recurring themes: the transition from restricted visitation to partnership-based care; practical family participation in routine care, communication, shared decision-making, rehabilitation, and end-of-life contexts; patient- and family-centered outcomes; structural, cultural, linguistic, and resource-related barriers; and the role of interdisciplinary teams, institutional policy, staff education, and digital tools in supporting implementation. Conclusions: Current evidence suggests that FIC may improve family experience, communication, parental confidence, and selected psychosocial outcomes, while its effects on long-term child outcomes and PICS-p require further pediatric-specific evaluation. Future work should prioritize clearer definitions, standardized implementation models, inclusive study designs, and pragmatic outcome measures that reflect both child and family priorities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.