Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433899›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in plant science2026

Nickel in agri-food systems: a review.

Alessio Elia, Onofrio Davide Palmitessa, Pietro Santamaria

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alessio EliaDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Onofrio Davide PalmitessaDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.
Pietro SantamariaDepartment of Soil, Plant and Food Sciences, University of Bari Aldo Moro, Bari, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nickel (Ni) is a widely distributed element in environmental and agri-food systems, deriving both from geogenic sources, such as ultramafic rocks and serpentine soils, and from anthropogenic inputs related to industrial activities, fossil fuel combustion and phosphate fertilization. Its ubiquitous presence favors its transfer into terrestrial ecosystems and the food chain, where plants represent the main interface between environmental compartments and the human diet. In the plant system, Ni plays a biphasic role: it is an essential micronutrient, acting as a cofactor of urease and involved in nitrogen metabolism, but it becomes phytotoxic at relatively high concentrations, inducing oxidative stress, photosynthetic alterations and nutritional imbalances. Absorption, transport, and accumulation in tissues depend on species, genotype, soil and environmental conditions, and agronomic practices, with direct implications for content in consumer products. In humans, exposure occurs predominantly via the dietary route; in sensitized individuals, even low concentrations can cause systemic manifestations, including systemic dermatitis and systemic Ni allergy syndrome (SNAS). The adoption of Regulation (EU) 2024/1987 introduced binding maximum limits for Ni in several food categories, strengthening the protection of the general population. In parallel, the increasing diffusion of "Ni-free" and "Ni-tested" products highlights an emerging demand, in the absence, however, of harmonized criteria for the use of such claims. In this context, the term "Ni-free" is generally used to refer to products with Ni concentrations below the detection or quantification limits of the analytical method used. Despite the extensive literature available, there remains a significant gap in the integration of environmental, agronomic, and regulatory perspectives to quantitatively identify the main factors governing Ni transfer along the soil-plant-food continuum. This review analyzes Ni transfer pathways from environmental sources to plant systems, the food chain, and human exposure, integrating physiological, agronomic, toxicological, and regulatory aspects. Particular attention is paid to closed-loop soilless systems, in which the Ni content depends on technical inputs and not on soil geochemistry. The results of the mass balance analysis indicate that mineral fertilizers can account for more than 80% of the total Ni input in the nutrient solution (NS), while pesticides and growing media play a secondary role. Overall, this review provides an integrated framework for understanding Ni transfer across agri-food systems, highlighting the central role of agronomic inputs in determining Ni accumulation in crops. These findings have direct implications for agricultural management and food security and support the development of reliable and standardized approaches for "Ni-free" production systems.

Indexed as

food safetyhydroponic cultivationnutrient solutionsystemic nickel allergy syndrome (SNAS)vegetables

Identifiers

PMID42433899
PMCPMC13350349

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.