Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433884›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in plant science2026

Comparative bibliometric insights into Chinese and international research on

Yihao Cui, Shuang Liu, Su Xie, Zhizhong Shen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Yihao CuiCollege of Humanities & Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Shuang LiuCollege of Humanities & Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.
Su XieSchool of Economics and Management, Wuchang Shouyi University, Wuhan, China.
Zhizhong ShenCollege of Humanities & Social Development, Nanjing Agricultural University, Nanjing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Methods: To address this gap, this study applies CiteSpace-based bibliometric methods to comparatively analyze Results: The annual number of publications on Discussion: Chinese-language research has gone through a development path from habitat investigation and resource census, to ecological restoration and saline-alkali land management, and then to more diversified functional and technological applications; and international research starts from ecological responses and population performance, gradually delving into physiological mechanisms, rhizosphere processes and multi-scale regulation. The cutting-edge hotspots in recent years include germplasm resource evaluation, remote sensing applications, plant-soil feedback, cell wall processes, and rhizosphere mediated ecological interactions, etc. Species nomenclatural confusion has caused inconsistent and unrepeatable results in salt tolerance physiology and restoration practices. Future research should strengthen taxonomic accuracy, deepen the integration of applied studies and mechanistic investigations, and promote broader international collaboration. This study provides a foundation for integrating applied saline-alkali land restoration with mechanistic stress physiology research.

Indexed as

bibliometricsCiteSpacedevelopment trendresearch hotspotsSuaeda

Identifiers

PMID42433884
PMCPMC13349923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.