ArticleFrontiers in plant science2026
A study on plant disease and pest detection and counting based on multi-scale enhancement and cross-scale fusion.
Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper targets the practical needs of plant disease and pest object detection and counting in complex field environments and proposes a lightweight improved framework based on YOLOv10. A MEMBA-F multi-scale feature enhancement module is introduced on the Neck to strengthen representations of small targets and weak-texture lesions, and a CSCAF cross-scale context-aware fusion module is designed to adaptively align high-level semantics with low-level details via cross-scale attention and gated selection, suppress background interference, and improve localization stability. The proposed method is systematically compared with two-stage detectors, YOLO-series models, and Transformer-based detectors on three public datasets, and is further investigated through ablation studies, confusion matrix analysis, and Grad-CAM interpretability analysis. In addition, a density-binned counting evaluation is conducted to validate robustness from sparse to dense scenarios. Experimental results demonstrate that the proposed method achieves superior performance in Precision, Recall, mAP@50, and mAP@50-95, and significantly reduces counting errors in dense scenes under deployable inference cost, providing reliable support for precision plant protection monitoring and decision making.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.