ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Improving adherence to venous thromboembolism prophylaxis guidelines in surgical inpatients: a closed-loop clinical audit in a resource-limited setting.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Venous thromboembolism (VTE) is a major cause of preventable morbidity and mortality among hospitalized surgical patients. Although evidence-based guidelines exist, adherence remains suboptimal, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. This audit assessed adherence to National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines for VTE prophylaxis among surgical inpatients and evaluated the impact of a targeted educational intervention. Materials & Methods: A prospective clinical audit was conducted at a tertiary care hospital. Adult surgical inpatients were assessed over two audit cycles of 100 patients each. The first cycle evaluated baseline compliance with five NICE NG89 standards: VTE risk assessment, bleeding risk assessment, appropriate thromboprophylaxis prescription, reassessment during admission, and patient information documentation. Following a targeted educational intervention and the introduction of structured documentation tools, a re-audit was performed. Data were analyzed descriptively and presented as proportions. Results: Baseline adherence was poor across all domains. No patients had documented VTE or bleeding risk assessments, and appropriate thromboprophylaxis was prescribed in only 3.1% of cases. Following the intervention, documentation of VTE and bleeding risk assessments improved to 100%. Prescription of appropriate thromboprophylaxis increased to 48.3%. Modest improvements were observed in VTE risk reassessment (11%) and patient education documentation (33.3%). Persistent gaps were noted in areas influenced by system-level constraints, including the inconsistent availability of prophylactic agents. Conclusion: Low-cost educational interventions can substantially improve VTE risk assessment and documentation in resource-limited settings. However, sustained improvement in thromboprophylaxis delivery requires parallel system-level support, reliable medication access, and integration of reassessment into routine clinical workflows.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.