ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
A cross-sectional analysis of liver disease-hypertension comorbid mortality trends in the United States, 1999-2023.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Comment on: A cross-sectional analysis of liver disease-hypertension comorbid mortality trends in the United States, 1999-2023.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The co-listing of liver disease and hypertension (HTN) codes on U.S. death certificates is a documentation pattern that may reflect changing clinical recognition, certification practices, or underlying disease burden; however, these explanations cannot be distinguished from death certificate data alone. Understanding co-listing patterns may help identify populations warranting further clinical and epidemiological investigation. This study analyzed 25 years of U.S. mortality data to characterize temporal, demographic, and geographic patterns in deaths due to both conditions. Methods: We conducted a population-based cross-sectional analysis of CDC WONDER multiple cause-of-death data (1999-2023) for adults aged ≥25 years. Deaths listing both liver disease (ICD-10: K70-K76) and HTN (I10-I15) were identified. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100 000 people were standardized to the 2000 U.S. population. Temporal trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression with annual percent changes (APCs). Analyses were stratified by sex, race/ethnicity, region, urbanization, and place of death. Sensitivity analyses using four alternative certificate definitions, including underlying-cause-only and co-listed definitions, were conducted to assess robustness to cause-of-death coding choices. Results: Between 1999 and 2023, 208 666 deaths listed both conditions, increasing from 2307 to 18 769 annually. The national AAMR increased from 1.30 to 6.75 per 100 000 (average APC: +6.71%, 95% CI: 5.64-7.80). Joinpoint regression identified four phases: rapid early growth (1999-2001, APC +19.50%), steady increase (2001-2018, APC +4.27%), substantial increase (2018-2021, APC +17.64%), and stabilization (2021-2023, APC +0.28%). Males showed higher rates than females (9.02 vs 4.71 per 100 000 in 2023). Non-Hispanic American Indian/Alaska Native populations showed the highest rates (12.74 per 100 000), followed by Hispanic (8.15), non-Hispanic White (6.95), and non-Hispanic Black (6.84) populations. Geographic variation ranged from 2.87 (Connecticut) to 21.54 (Oklahoma) per 100 000. Sensitivity analyses confirmed that increasing trends were robust to the choice of cause definition, although the post-2021 trajectory was definition-sensitive. Conclusion: The number of deaths listed with both liver disease and hypertension codes increased substantially over 25 years, with notable acceleration during 2018-2021 that coincided temporally with the COVID-19 pandemic; however, causal attribution cannot be made from death certificate data. Because the findings reflect death certificate documentation rather than validated clinical comorbidity, they should be interpreted as surveillance indicators identifying demographic and geographic patterns that warrant further investigation through clinical registries and prospective study designs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.