ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Comparative evaluation of hook plate and tension band wiring in the management of acromioclavicular dislocation: a retrospective study.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The acromioclavicular (AC) joint is located between the lateral end of the clavicle and the medial part of the acromion. The joint capsule is reinforced by a strong system of ligaments, and there is a fibrocartilaginous disc between the two bony surfaces. The AC joint dislocation (ACD) is a fairly common shoulder girdle injury, which is seen in about 9-12% of active adults. The aim of this study was to perform a comparative descriptive evaluation of two commonly used surgical techniques - tension band wiring (TBW) and hook plate (HP) fixation - for the treatment of acute AC dislocations (Rockwood types III-V), focusing on functional recovery, radiological outcomes, and complication profiles rather than demonstrating the superiority of one technique over the other. Patients and methods: A retrospective comparative study was conducted at our hospital between 2022 and 2024. The study included patients with acute AC dislocation (within 2 weeks after injury) who were regularly monitored for at least 6 months. Results: All 34 patients were able to return to their pre-surgical occupation. The total operative time was shorter in the TBW group, with no statistical significance. The time during which the operated arm was supported with a sling was shorter in the HP group (around 2-4 weeks), which was statistically significant ( Conclusion: Both methods used in our study are adequate options for the management of acute AC dislocation, and while they differ in surgical technique, they are comparable in functional and clinical outcomes. While the TBW is a cheaper alternative, we found that the HP group had fewer complications and allowed early full range of motion, always keeping in mind the removal of the plate within 3 months to prevent osteolysis and subacromial irritation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.