Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433854›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Decision-making in emergency colorectal surgery for cancer.

Elroy Patrick Weledji

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Elroy Patrick WeledjiDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Buea, Limbe, Cameroon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0473-4883

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the most common gastrointestinal (GI) malignancy and the second most common cause of cancer-related death. Emergency presentations constitute about 20% of admissions for CRC. The article discusses the current arguments and evidence that drive decision-making in emergency colorectal surgery for complications (obstruction, perforation, and bleeding) of CRC. The goal of the surgeon is to control in-hospital mortality, local recurrence of CRC, and quality of life. An electronic literature search of the MEDLINE (PubMed) database, Cochrane Library, and Science Citation Index was performed to identify original published studies on CRC emergencies and their management. The findings are that the timeliness and adequacy of management of CRC complications depend on an interaction between patient-, disease-, and surgeon-related factors. In perforated CRC, short-term survival is determined by sepsis. The empirical surgical intervention in emergency colorectal surgery for malignancy is determined by the patient's status and the disease.

Indexed as

cancercolorectalcomplicationsdecision-makingemergencyintervention

Identifiers

PMID42433854
PMCPMC13354341

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.