ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Isolated subcutaneous sarcoidosis presenting as multiple nodules: a rare case with diagnostic challenges.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction and importance: Isolated subcutaneous sarcoidosis is an uncommon form of sarcoidosis, typically presenting as firm, painless nodules beneath clinically normal skin. Its rarity, especially in male patients or in atypical anatomical locations, can mimic malignant or infectious processes and cause significant diagnostic uncertainty. Recognizing this entity is important to prevent misdiagnosis and unnecessary interventions. Case presentation: A 51-year-old man presented with multiple progressively enlarging subcutaneous nodules over the scalp, face, trunk, and extremities for 1 year, without systemic symptoms. Imaging demonstrated well-defined subcutaneous soft-tissue lesions with no bony involvement. Fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy revealed non-caseating granulomas composed of fibrohistiocytic and multinucleated giant cells. Immunohistochemistry showed CD68 and S100 positivity, CD1a negativity, and a low Ki-67 index, confirming isolated subcutaneous sarcoidosis. A comprehensive evaluation found no systemic involvement at presentation. Clinical discussion: Subcutaneous sarcoidosis is rare and may closely resemble neoplastic or infectious conditions, particularly when presenting in unusual distributions or in male patients. Diagnosis relies on histopathologic confirmation of non-caseating granulomas, supported by immunohistochemical findings. Management should be individualized; options include observation for asymptomatic cases and topical or systemic corticosteroids for progressive or symptomatic lesions. Long-term monitoring is essential because systemic manifestations may develop later. Conclusion: This case highlights the importance of considering isolated subcutaneous sarcoidosis in the differential diagnosis of firm, painless nodules. Accurate diagnosis depends on histopathology and immunohistochemistry, and tailored management with ongoing follow-up is recommended. Reporting rare presentations broadens understanding of the clinical spectrum of sarcoidosis and ultimately supports timely, appropriate, and effective comprehensive patient care.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.