Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433817›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Measles outbreaks in Nepal: sustaining rapid response through equity-focused immunization and surveillance.

Alisha G C, Binod G C

Abstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alisha G CNepalgunj Medial College, Banke, Nepal.
Binod G CDepartment of Infection and Immunology, Kathmandu Research Institute for Biological Sciences (KRIBS), Lalitpur, Nepal.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6051-9590

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent measles outbreaks in Nepal's Sarlahi and Baglung districts show persistent subnational immunity gaps despite national progress toward measles elimination. This letter supports Nepal's rapid and coordinated outbreak response, particularly in Sarlahi, where early clinical suspicion, laboratory confirmation within 72 hours, household investigation, active case search, vitamin A supplementation, and outbreak response immunization were promptly implemented. These actions demonstrate the value of functional surveillance, laboratory capacity, and multisectoral coordination. However, the outbreaks also reveal that administrative declarations of high or full immunization coverage may mask susceptibility among marginalized and mobile populations. Cases clustered among under-immunized children in poor Muslim, Dalit, and migrant-linked communities, highlighting measles as a sensitive tracer of inequity in immunization systems. Sustained elimination will require ward-level microplanning, active identification of zero-dose and under-vaccinated children, catch-up vaccination for older cohorts, strengthened risk communication, and engagement of trusted community and religious leaders. Nepal's recent response provides an encouraging model, but long-term success depends on converting rapid outbreak control into preventive, equity-focused routine immunization.

Indexed as

disease surveillancehealth equityimmunizationmeasles outbreakNepal

Identifiers

PMID42433817
PMCPMC13354423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.