ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Colonic diverticular disease: a bibliometric and visual analysis of the top 50 cited publications.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Colonic diverticular disease (CDD) is a prevalent gastrointestinal condition with evolving patterns in diagnosis, management, and research focus. However, no prior study has systematically mapped the academic literature shaping the field. This bibliometric and visual analysis aims to identify and evaluate the 50 most-cited publications on CDD. Articles were retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection, and data were extracted on citation count, publication year, journal, country of origin, study design, level of evidence, authorship gender, and primary outcomes. Additionally, keyword co-occurrence and country collaboration networks were analyzed. Data were visualized using VOSviewer and Microsoft Excel. The most-cited articles were published between 1953 and 2020, with a concentration between 2010 and 2015. The United States accounted for 58% of the top-cited studies, with limited representation from low- and middle-income countries. Retrospective cohort studies, reviews, and guidelines were the most frequent study types, while level 5 and level 1 evidence predominated. Surgical management emerged as the most common thematic focus, with relatively few articles addressing patient-reported outcomes, microbiome-related mechanisms, or cost-effectiveness. A notable gender imbalance was observed, with male authors occupying most first and senior author positions. Citation performance varied widely, with Painter
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.