ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Thoracoabdominal aortic replacement in the elderly: a retrospective propensity score-matched outcome analysis.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives: With the overall aging population, the demand for thoracoabdominal aortic repair in elderly patients will continue to increase. With rising frequency, surgeons and physicians will have to decide whether this highly invasive procedure is appropriate and rational for their elderly patients. However, data focused on the outcomes of thoracoabdominal repair in elderly patients is still lacking to date. Methods: We here report a propensity score-matched, single-center analysis of 309 consecutive patients who underwent open surgical thoracoabdominal aortic repair from 2000 to 2024. Of those, 72 patients (23.3%) were 70 years of age or older. Matching for preoperative characteristics, burden of disease, and extent of repair revealed 68 one-on-one matches of patients below or above 70 years of age. These were then analyzed for intraoperative characteristics as well as postoperative events, complications, and mortality. Results: Elderly patients had longer intensive care unit stay times, with 6 days [interquartile range (IQR) 3-14] versus 3 days (IQR 2-8, Conclusion: Elderly patients were more frequently prone to a prolonged and complicated postoperative course. However, this did not result in excessive short-term mortality. Thus, elderly patients should be critically evaluated before undergoing thoracoabdominal aortic repair, and both patients and surgeons should be prepared for prolonged ICU times. However, age alone should not be an exclusion criterion for thoracoabdominal aortic repair, which can be performed with acceptable short-term mortality rates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.