ReviewAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Compliance and completeness of WHO Surgical Safety Checklist in a tertiary-level neurosurgical center in Nepal: a retrospective descriptive audit.
Review in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
One million deaths and seven million complications occur in an estimated 234 million procedures carried out worldwide each year; half of these deaths are preventable. Studies have reported a reduction in the mortality rate by 50% after the introduction of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist (WHO-SSC). Surgical errors resulting from poor safety practices have had devastating outcomes; by identifying current practices and potential gaps in checklist adherence, this research aims to enhance patient safety and improve surgical outcomes. A retrospective, descriptive, cross-sectional study was performed at Upendra Devkota Memorial National Institute of Neurological and Allied Sciences to assess the compliance and completeness of the WHO-SSC in 50 consecutive patients undergoing cranial and spinal surgery under general anesthesia before and after COVID (Jan-Feb 2020 and 2023). The difference in compliance and completeness in elective and emergency cases, as well as in the two timelines, was also evaluated. In 2020, there were 19 emergencies and 31 electives; and in 2023, there were 16 emergencies and 34 electives. The WHO-SSC was not filled in 21% of emergency cases in 2020 and in 38% of emergency cases in 2023. In elective cases, around 25% of cases didn't have the WHO-SSC filled in both timelines. Regarding the completeness of the WHO-SSC, there was a stark difference noted in the elective and emergency cases in the Sign-In domain, with patient identity confirmation done in only 53% of cases and site marking in 20% of cases in emergency neurosurgery. WHO-SSC is a proven tool that helps reduce surgical errors, morbidity, and even mortality. If not regularly emphasized, the compliance with conducting WHO-SSC wanes over time, especially in emergency neurosurgery compared to elective procedures, which can result in devastating consequences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.