Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433781›Full record

ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026

Efficacy and safety of rupatadine in allergic rhinitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Abdur Rehman, Arham Ihtesham, Hafsa Arshad Azam Raja, Muhammad Ibrahim, Muhammad Ahmad Khalid, Sadia Chaudhry, Shahzaib Maqbool, Rahmat Gul Omarzai, Jazza Aamir, Haissan Iftikhar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Abdur RehmanDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6118-717X
Arham IhteshamInternal Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
Hafsa Arshad Azam RajaInternal Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0794-7013
Muhammad IbrahimInternal Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-6296-874X
Muhammad Ahmad KhalidInternal Medicine, Rawalpindi Medical University, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.
Sadia ChaudhryDepartment of ENT and Head and Neck Surgery, Benazir Bhutto Hospital, Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-2251-2907
Shahzaib MaqboolInternal Medicine, HCA Healthcare Kansas City, Missouri, USA.
Rahmat Gul OmarzaiFaculty of Medicine, Nangarhar University, Nangarhar, Afghanistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-9830-5649
Jazza AamirDepartment of Medicine, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan.
Haissan IftikharDepartment of ENT, University Hospitals Northamptonshire, Northamptonshire, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rupatadine, a dual H1-histamine and platelet-activating factor antagonist, has shown promise in allergic rhinitis (AR), but its overall efficacy and safety remain variably reported. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the therapeutic effectiveness and tolerability of rupatadine in adults with seasonal and perennial AR. Methods: Following PRISMA guidelines, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane CENTRAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched from inception to April 2025 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing rupatadine with placebo after registration on PROSPERO (CRD42025065190). Data on nasal symptom reduction, quality of life, and adverse events were pooled using a random-effects model, expressed as standardized mean differences (SMD) with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane RoB-2 tool. Results: Eight RCTs comprising 2442 participants were included. Rupatadine significantly reduced total nasal symptom scores (SMD = -1.36; Conclusion: Rupatadine is an effective, well-tolerated therapy for AR, providing significant relief from key nasal symptoms, particularly at higher doses. Although quality-of-life benefits were modest, the findings support rupatadine's role as a safe and potent antihistamine option, warranting further long-term and real-world evaluation.

Indexed as

allergic rhinitishistamine H1 antagonistsplatelet-activating factorquality of liferupatadine

Identifiers

PMID42433781
PMCPMC13354435

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.