ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Uni-portal non-coaxial spinal endoscopic surgery via crossing midline approach for cervical radiculopathy: a case series of four patients.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Cervical radiculopathy typically presents with pain, numbness, and weakness in the affected nerve root distribution. When caused by bony foraminal stenosis, conventional posterior keyhole foraminotomy often necessitates extensive facetectomy, risking spinal instability. A modified approach preserving facets is therefore needed. This study assessed the feasibility and preliminary outcomes of uni-portal non-coaxial spinal endoscopic surgery (UNSES) with a crossing midline approach (CMA) for cervical radiculopathy. Methods: Four patients with cervical radiculopathy caused by bony foraminal stenosis underwent nerve root decompression via the CMA between March 2025 and April 2025. In this retrospective, single-center study, patients with a history of infection, trauma, or tumor were excluded. The surgical procedure involved three key steps: removal of V-point osteophytes using a high-speed drill, excision of herniated nucleus pulposus, and preservation of the lateral bony structure of the ipsilateral facet joint. Technical details of this novel approach are comprehensively described. Results: Mean operative time was 168.5 (98, 196) mins with blood loss of 15 (5, 50) mL. At 1 month, the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scores improved by 1 (0, 5) points and the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores improved by 16 (14, 17) points. Facet joint resection rate averaged 40.61% (18.21%, 47.05%). All four incisions healed within 2 weeks without complications at the 6-month follow-up. Conclusion: The UNSES technique via the CMA approach successfully achieves nerve root decompression while maximizing cervical facet joint preservation, without compromising spinal cord or adjacent neurovascular integrity. Importantly, it establishes a novel minimally invasive surgical option for cervical radiculopathy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.