ArticleAnnals of medicine and surgery (2012)2026
Clinical outcomes of bronchodilator use in bronchiolitis: an evidence-based perspective.
Article in Annals of medicine and surgery (2012), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Bronchiolitis is a leading cause of lower respiratory tract infection in infants, most commonly associated with respiratory syncytial virus, and contributes significantly to global pediatric morbidity. Despite its high prevalence, management remains largely supportive, as no pharmacologic therapy has consistently demonstrated a reduction in disease duration or hospitalization outcomes. This review evaluates the clinical efficacy of bronchodilators, particularly salbutamol, in the treatment of bronchiolitis based on current evidence. While some randomized controlled trials report short-term improvements in clinical scores following bronchodilator administration, pooled data from meta-analyses indicate no significant benefit in key clinical outcomes, including oxygen saturation, hospitalization rates, length of hospital stay, or time to resolution of illness. Furthermore, bronchodilator use has been associated with adverse physiological effects, such as increased heart rate and respiratory rate. The underlying pathophysiology of bronchiolitis, characterized primarily by airway obstruction due to inflammation, edema, and mucus plugging rather than bronchospasm, explains the limited efficacy of bronchodilators. Current international guidelines strongly discourage their routine use and emphasize supportive care as the cornerstone of management. Bridging the gap between evidence and clinical practice is essential to avoid unnecessary interventions and optimize patient outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.