ArticleEuropean journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X2026
The use of pessary for pelvic organ prolapse in pregnancy: A case report.
Article in European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) complicating pregnancy is rare, and evidence for its management remains limited. We report a case of advanced POP during pregnancy that was successfully managed with a ring pessary. A 40-year-old woman with longstanding prolapse presented with worsening symptoms during pregnancy. Conservative management with a vaginal pessary provided effective antepartum support and allowed continuation of pregnancy until spontaneous labor. After vaginal delivery, prolapse recurred and was successfully managed with pessary reinsertion during the puerperium after lochia had decreased. At short-term follow-up, the prolapse remained well controlled and no pessary-related complications were observed. This case supports the feasibility of conservative pessary management in selected pregnant women with POP and suggests that reinsertion during the puerperium may be useful for ongoing symptom control.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.