SynthesisDepression and anxiety2026
A Systematic Review of Community Pharmacy-Led Depression Services: Service Components, Outcomes, and Implementation Barriers and Facilitators.
Synthesis in Depression and anxiety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- A Systematic Review of Community Pharmacy-Led Depression Services: Service Components, Outcomes, and Implementation Barriers and Facilitators.Depression and anxiety · 2026Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Depression is the most common mental ill health condition, and its prevalence is increasing. Despite this, its treatment is variable often due to a lack of capacity within healthcare systems to support this vulnerable population. Community pharmacy staff could offer additional support. This systematic review identifies depression services led by community pharmacy staff, their service components, outcomes, and barriers/facilitators to their implementation. Methods: Four bibliographic databases were searched (Medline, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and CINAHL) from 2000 onwards. Title/abstract and full-text screening was conducted. Data on the service components were mapped to the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR). Clinical, humanistic, economic, and service outcomes were charted. Barriers and facilitators were mapped to the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR). Quality assessment was performed using the Quality Assessment with Diverse Studies (QuADS) tool. Results: Fifty studies were included. Seventeen studies identified general attitudes regarding community pharmacy services for depression, which were generally supportive. The majority ( Conclusion: This international review identified a range of different services that community pharmacy staff can deliver to support people with depression, ranging from supporting diagnosis, health literacy, and management plans. The accessibility of community pharmacies for depression service delivery warrants further investigation. However, limited empirical evidence of clinical and economic outcomes and reported implementation barriers may complicate broader implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.