Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433683›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2026

Animal models of diabetes-related shoulder disorders.

Weifeng Guo, Long Chen, Licheng Chen, Wanxia Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Weifeng GuoGuangdong Provincial Second Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Guangzhou, China.
Long ChenFoshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Licheng ChenFoshan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, The Eighth Clinical Medical College of Guangzhou University of Chinese Medicine, Foshan, China.
Wanxia ZhangThe First Dongguan Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University, Dongguan, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diabetic shoulder pathology constitutes a significant complication of diabetes mellitus, characterized by complex pathological mechanisms and a lack of systematic research models. Existing animal models can simulate pathological processes such as frozen shoulder, rotator cuff repair impairment, or natural degeneration at different levels, yet they exhibit certain limitations. These include inconsistency with the metabolic background of human type 2 diabetes, a lack of dynamic observation of multi-tissue collaborative pathologies, and difficulty in replicating the natural clinical disease course. This article analyzes three mainstream animal models: the diabetes-combined frozen shoulder model, the diabetes-combined rotator cuff injury and repair model, and the type 2 diabetes-induced natural degeneration model of the rotator cuff tendon. By comparing the modeling methodologies, pathological features, advantages, and disadvantages of these different models, potential improvements are proposed. An ideal diabetic shoulder model should simultaneously replicate the metabolic characteristics of type 2 diabetes, simulate the progressive and collaborative pathology of multiple shoulder structures (tendon, joint capsule, subchondral bone), and incorporate behavioral assessments for pain and functional impairment. Promoting a paradigm shift in animal models from "single-disease simulation" to "integrated simulation" will provide an important platform for elucidating the pathogenesis of diabetic shoulder and developing novel therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

animal modelsdiabetesfrozen shoulderrotator cuff tendinopathyshoulder disorders

Identifiers

PMID42433683
PMCPMC13354090

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.