Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433651›Full record

ReviewTransfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie2026

Overview of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Haemophilia Gene Therapy.

Wolfgang Miesbach

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Haemophilia: Novel Therapies and Diagnostic Challenges.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Wolfgang MiesbachMedical Clinic 2, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Three adeno-associated virus-based gene therapies for haemophilia have received regulatory approval in Western countries since 2022, yet commercial uptake has been slow. Traditional clinical endpoints - annualised bleeding rate and factor activity levels - document haemostatic efficacy, but fail to capture what matters most to patients. Both the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA) increasingly recognise patient-reported outcomes (PROs) as meaningful endpoints for regulatory and health technology assessment decisions. Summary: Narrative review of peer-reviewed literature in PubMed and Web of Science (2017-2026) covering PRO instruments, clinical trial evidence, cost-effectiveness analyses, and qualitative patient data in haemophilia gene therapy. Six trials have reported PRO data using a total of 12 different instruments, of which five principal measures of which five measures are central to the quality-of-life evidence: the disease-specific Haem-A-QoL and Haemo-QoL-A, the generic EQ-5D-5L, and the gene therapy-specific coreHEM Mental Health Outlook (coreHEM-MHO). Across all studies, gene therapy produced clinically meaningful improvements in quality of life. Total disease-specific quality-of-life scores improved by 6-15 points across trials - exceeding established clinically important difference thresholds - with the largest gains in the Treatment and Dealing with Haemophilia domains. EQ-5D-5L utility indices increased significantly in multiple trials. In the SPK-9001 long-term follow-up, durable Haem-A-QoL gains were confirmed through 156 weeks. The coreHEM-MHO, developed to capture psychological dimensions unique to gene therapy such as durability anxiety and disease identity adjustment, has been piloted in BENEGENE-2. Qualitative interviews documented profound reductions in treatment burden and improved daily functioning. Key Messages: PRO evidence consistently demonstrates that haemophilia gene therapy delivers quality-of-life benefits that extend well beyond what traditional clinical endpoints capture. These PRO-derived improvements are also the principal driver of gene therapy's economic value since cost-effectiveness models show substantial gains in health-related quality of life but negligible gains in life expectancy. Priorities include standardised coreHEM measurement, long-term registries, and ensuring certified haemophilia centres are equipped for systematic PRO follow-up.

Indexed as

coreHEMGene therapyHaem-A-QoLHaemophiliaHaemo-Qol-AHealth technology assessmentPatient-reported outcomesQuality of life

Identifiers

PMID42433651
PMCPMC13354295

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.