ArticleInternet interventions2026
Forecasting stress transitions using ecological momentary assessment data and machine learning.
Article in Internet interventions, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
24 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Stress is associated with many negative effects, including inadequate sleep, reduced learning and memory, and a higher risk of mental health conditions. Given these effects, it is important to explore effective strategies for stress management and intervention. One promising approach is the use of ecological momentary assessments (EMAs), which allow us to measure an individuals' experiences in their natural environments, offering valuable data to inform just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs). Machine learning can further enhance JITAIs by forecasting stress-related emotional states, enabling proactive intervention delivery to prevent heightened stress. In this study, we focus on forecasting stress utilizing data from a large mental health project. During this project, EMA data was collected from different vulnerable target groups across Europe, including youth, older adults, migrants, and individuals with low socioeconomic status. We formulated the forecasting task as a binary classification problem: predicting either transitions from normal to elevated stress or the stability of normal stress, based on a person's stress distribution. This approach simplifies the task, supports personalized predictions, and enables actionable insights, as predicting elevated stress can directly trigger support. Our results demonstrate that machine learning models are capable of forecasting stress transitions (ROC-AUC = 0.70 vs. 0.50 for a random classifier), although predicting transitions to elevated stress proved more challenging than identifying stable normal stress. Models trained on combined data from all populations performed comparable to those trained on individual populations. Furthermore, cross-country evaluations indicated that population-specific models generalized well across most populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.