ArticleOcular oncology and pathology2026
Clinical, Imaging, Pathological, and Molecular Details of an Unusual Uveal Melanocytic Tumor of Childhood.
Article in Ocular oncology and pathology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Uveal melanomas are rare and usually detected in adults over 60 years old. We presented herein an unusual intraocular melanocytic tumor that does not fit into any known category in a child with 10-year follow-up data. The clinical findings, course, ultrasound, MRI, and pathology, including immunohistochemistry and gene profiling, of a child with pigmented intraocular masses simulating uveal melanoma are described. The tumor is provisionally called "endopapillary uveal melanocytic tumor of childhood" based on its unusual pathology and molecular biology. Comprehensive molecular testing, including MSK-IMPACT, which interrogates 468 known cancer genetic alterations, and Archer fusion testing (RNA sequence analysis) revealed no abnormalities. Case Presentation: Our patient was a 7-month-old white boy with a suspected mass in the left eye. There was no family history of melanoma. An MRI scan revealed a 1.9 × 1.7-cm well-circumscribed, heterogeneously T1 pre-contrast hyperintense mass, which demonstrated heterogeneous low signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging. A needle biopsy using a 25-gauge needle revealed a pigmented tumor, so we performed an enucleation. Upon histopathologic examination after enucleation, the tumor was densely pigmented, without significant necrosis or internal cavitation. Tumor cells grew around vascular "papillae." Six years later, the patient is alive and shows no evidence of local or systemic recurrence. Conclusion: Our case exhibited unique features and pathology, without any of the known genetic abnormalities associated with uveal melanoma and does not match the descriptions in the existing literature. Thus, we have named these masses "endopapillary uveal melanocytic tumor of childhood."
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.