ArticleNational science review2026
Increasingly severe thermal stresses on global photosynthesis using insights from observations of canopy temperature.
Article in National science review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Temperatures could routinely exceed the optimal levels for photosynthesis as global warming intensifies, imposing thermal stress on the productivity of vegetation. We utilized satellite-derived canopy temperature and gross primary productivity data from 2003 to 2024 to identify the ecosystem-level optimal canopy temperature ([Formula: see text]) for global photosynthesis and the extent of any thermal acclimation, which may offset warming impacts. Our findings indicate that across the globe, heat-induced restrictions on global photosynthesis are worsening, and areas subjected to thermal limitations have expanded by 1.7 billion hectares (57% increase) over the last 22 years. The number of days per year with high thermal suppression of photosynthesis during that period has increased sharply, averaging 28 days globally, and is especially high in tropical forests (117 days) and key agricultural regions (39 days). We demonstrate that vegetation acclimation to higher canopy temperature is partially mitigating emerging heat stress, but it is insufficient to keep up with the rate of global warming, with more than 90% of vegetated areas across the globe exhibiting only partial acclimation. A key feature of our analysis is the use of canopy-level temperatures, which more accurately represent the actual temperatures that vegetation physiologically responds to, rather than air temperature used in previous research. This difference accounts for our identified more rapidly intensifying vegetation response to warming than that estimated by other analyses. Overall, our canopy-level analysis reveals an escalating threat to global vegetation productivity and highlights the need for climate models to have refined land components, which often rely on air-temperature forcing and simplified acclimation schemes. Required are targeted ecosystem management strategies for adaptation to further global warming.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.