Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433590›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2026

Prediction of cardiac cycle duration for cardiac-gated closed-loop auricular vagus nerve stimulation.

Dibya Chowdhury, Kevin Schuh, Eugenijus Kaniusas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Dibya ChowdhuryInstitute of Biomedical Electronics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Kevin SchuhInstitute of Biomedical Electronics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.
Eugenijus KaniusasInstitute of Biomedical Electronics, Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Auricular vagus nerve stimulation (aVNS) is a neuromodulation technology that establishes balance in the autonomic nervous system and, in turn, provides therapy for numerous chronic ailments. Personalized aVNS adapts the stimulation parameters in accordance with the time-varying physiological state of the body, and is suggested to improve the therapeutic outcomes and reduce side effects. The physiological state is estimated via recorded biomarkers such as the electrocardiogram (ECG). aVNS can be delivered in synchrony with any phase of the cardiac cycle before and after the R-peak. This paper proposes the prediction of the duration of the next cardiac cycle after the detected R-peak for the realization of the personalized cardiac-gated closed-loop aVNS applied at any time point during the predicted cardiac cycle. We propose and explore the feasibility of four different prediction methods for predicting the duration of the next cardiac cycle. Two methods are respiration-insensitive, last value and averaging, and the other two are respiration-sensitive, extrapolation and interpolation. Offline recorded ECG waveforms were used to evaluate the different methods. Subsequently, three of the four methods (last value, averaging, and extrapolation) were implemented in real-time on a proprietary aVNS hardware setup, with the data acquisition performed across normal and paced deep breathing. Offline evaluation of the methods revealed that extrapolation and interpolation achieved lower prediction errors during deep breathing with the median absolute error (MdAE) of 32.09 ms (interquartile range 16.07-56.61 ms) and 31.71 ms (15.5-54.06 ms), respectively, as compared with the averaging and last-value methods with 88.75 ms (58.73-124.15 ms) and 40.85 ms (19.7-68.4 ms), respectively. During normal breathing, all evaluated methods yielded lower prediction errors relative to the averaging method 28.5 ms (15.2-43.7 ms). Real-time implementation validated these methods for closed-loop cardiac-gated aVNS, with the best performance achieved by the extrapolation method with 31.4 ms (15.17-55.9 ms) during paced deep breathing. During normal breathing, comparable performance across prediction methods favors the computationally simple last-value approach (MdAE: 31.6 ms). Proposed methods establish the potential of ECG-based R-peak prediction in real-time as a reliable and individual biomarker for the personalized cardiac-gated aVNS, creating a foundation for future clinical applications of aVNS.

Indexed as

auricular vagus nerve stimulationcardiac-gated stimulationECGheartbeat prediction methodspersonalized neuromodulation

Identifiers

PMID42433590
PMCPMC13350030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.