ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026
Synthesizing cone-beam projections in radiotherapy using deep learning network for patients with head and neck cancer.
Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Initially, cone-beam (CB) projection was developed to serve as a two-dimensional (2D) radiograph for fast target localization in radiotherapy. Later, it was gradually replaced by three-dimensional (3D) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT), which is reconstructed from multiple CB projections. Since the size of CB projections is relatively large, they are usually discarded to conserve clinical storage. To effectively regenerate these projections, a deep learning (DL) method was developed to synthesize CB projections from CBCT. Methods: CB projection images from 50 patients under image-guided radiotherapy for head and neck cancer was collected. First, the digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) was created via a ray-tracing based algorithm. Next, a DL network was built to learn the pixel-to-pixel correspondence between the DRRs and CB projections in the training set. Finally, the CB projections were synthesized from DRRs in the testing set by a DL model. Three DL networks, Attention-UNet, Residual AutoEncoder, and Pix2Pix, were examined. Ablation studies on the effects of scatter correction, CBCT resolution, and training sample size were conducted. Non-DL and DL methods were compared, and a clinically relevant downstream task was conducted. Three similarity metrics, peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index measure (SSIM), and video quality metric (VQM), were used to evaluate model performance. Results: Among three DL models, Attention-UNet achieved the best performance in terms of PSNR (29.71), SSIM (0.97), and VQM (0.20). The other two models showed comparable performance with PSNR, SSIM, and VQM values of 26.55, 0.96, and 0.27, respectively, for Residual AutoEncoder, and of 27.22, 0.94, and 0.25, respectively, for Pix2Pix. With scatter correction, the PSNR, SSIM, and VQM for Attention-UNet improved by 21.3%, 2.1%, and 39.3%, respectively. Under the finest voxel size (0.5×0.5×2.0 mm Conclusions: The DL-based method can effectively synthesize CB projections from CBCT for patients with head and neck cancer. It may thus serve as a means to saving storage space for clinical CB projections.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.