Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433522›Full record

ArticleQuantitative imaging in medicine and surgery2026

The value of [

Runjie Shui, Jihui Li, Shushan Ge, Jinming Cao, Shengming Deng, Bin Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Runjie Shui *Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6011-3030
Jihui Li *Department of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Shushan GeDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Jinming CaoDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Shengming DengDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Bin ZhangDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Accurate differentiation between malignant and benign prostate lesions remains challenging, particularly in patients with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-4 scores. This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of fluorine-18 prostate-specific membrane antigen-1007 ([ Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 135 patients with PI-RADS 3-4 lesions who underwent [ Results: Significant differences between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and PCa groups were observed in age, PSA, fPSA/tPSA, PV, PSAD, SUV Conclusions: Our findings suggest that [

Indexed as

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI)positron emission tomography (PET)prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)prostatic neoplasms

Identifiers

PMID42433522
PMCPMC13350630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.