Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433500›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of radiology open2026

Imaging in the postpartum period.

Girija Agarwal, Nishat Bharwani, Sadia Raheez Qamar, Marisa Taylor-Clarke, Elika Kashef, Raffaella Basilico, Elizabeth Dick

Abstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of radiology open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Girija AgarwalDepartment of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, LondonW2 1NY UK.
Nishat BharwaniDepartment of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, LondonW2 1NY UK.
Sadia Raheez QamarDepartment of Medical Imaging, Sunnybrook Health Science Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada.
Marisa Taylor-ClarkeDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, LondonW2 1NY UK.
Elika KashefDepartment of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, LondonW2 1NY UK.
Raffaella BasilicoDepartment of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, University G. D'Annunzio Chieti-Pescara, Chieti, Italy.
Elizabeth DickDepartment of Radiology, Imperial College Healthcare Trust, LondonW2 1NY UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The postpartum period is characterised by significant physiological and anatomical changes that may mimic pathology on imaging. Exposure to puerperal imaging varies between healthcare systems and may depend on whether postnatal ultrasound is performed primarily by radiologists or obstetricians/gynaecologists. Differentiating normal postpartum appearances from true complications can therefore be challenging, particularly when clinical presentations are non-specific. This review summarises normal and abnormal postpartum imaging findings and describes a structured checklist to systematically evaluate the pelvic organs.

Indexed as

EndometritisPostpartum complicationsPostpartum haemorrhagePostpartum imaging findingsRetained products of conception

Identifiers

PMID42433500
PMCPMC13351678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.