ArticleFrontiers in psychology2026
Why some minds bend, not break: an exploratory study of cognitive and psychological performance across levels of cognitive reserve in subjective cognitive decline.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Subjective Cognitive Decline (SCD) is a heterogeneous at-risk condition along the Alzheimer's disease continuum, characterized by cognitive complaints despite preserved neuropsychological performance. Cognitive reserve (CR) may help explain individual differences in resilience to early cognitive and psychological vulnerability. This exploratory cross-sectional study examined whether global and domain-specific CR-education, occupational activity, and leisure time - were associated with differences in cognitive and psychological functioning in individuals with SCD. Methods: Fifty-one older adults with SCD underwent a comprehensive neuropsychological assessment and self-report measures of subjective complaints, depressive symptoms, and anxiety. Non-parametric analyses compared performance across low, medium, and high CR levels. Results: Cognitive performance was globally preserved, while depressive symptoms were clinically relevant in a substantial proportion of participants. Selective CR-related differences emerged: higher global CR was associated with better visuospatial-constructive performance; lower leisure-time CR was associated with faster performance on attentional and executive tasks; and occupational CR showed a non-monotonic association with depressive symptoms, with lower scores in the medium CR group. No differences emerged in other cognitive domains. Discussion: These findings support a multidimensional and domain-specific conceptualization of CR in SCD and highlight the clinical value of integrating CR into early cognitive aging assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.