ArticleSSM. Mental health2026
Painful subjects: the sociogenic processing of pain in individuals with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes.
Article in SSM. Mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
It is well demonstrated that the chronic pain experienced by individuals with Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS) has a negative effect on their overall quality of life. Despite this, this population experiences high levels of doubt and invalidation from clinicians regarding the frequency and intensity of their pain. In this qualitative study, we interviewed 39 individuals with EDS in order to investigate how experiencing doubt from clinicians impacted their self-perceptions of pain. Contrary to the claim that pain is a purely private phenomenon, our participants' experiences were mediated by social dynamics related to epistemic and power asymmetries. These asymmetries affected their willingness to acknowledge their pain to others, to judge it against the experiences of those whom they considered biomedically "normal," and even to discount the reality of their pain experience. In analyzing these findings, we examine the discursive and intersubjective forces that shape the experience of chronic pain in this population and argue for the expansion of the biopsychosocial model to include these sociogenic processes by which patients rearticulate and reconceptualize their pain to match clinical expectations of "normal" symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.