Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433476›Full record

ArticleSSM. Mental health2026

Painful subjects: the sociogenic processing of pain in individuals with Ehlers-Danlos syndromes.

Tom A Doyle, Samantha L Vershaw, Colin M E Halverson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SSM. Mental health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tom A DoyleCenter for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-8565-0648
Samantha L VershawCenter for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0009-0004-8610-0885
Colin M E HalversonCenter for Bioethics, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4205-7860

Funding

Improving Care for Rare Genetic Diseases: Patient-Provider Communication and Patient Validation in the Ehlers-Danlos SyndromesK01HG012408 · NHGRI · INDIANA UNIVERSITY INDIANAPOLIS · PI Colin Michael Egenberger Halverson · 2022 to 2026
$836k
NHGRI NIH HHS K01 HG012408
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

It is well demonstrated that the chronic pain experienced by individuals with Ehlers-Danlos Syndromes (EDS) has a negative effect on their overall quality of life. Despite this, this population experiences high levels of doubt and invalidation from clinicians regarding the frequency and intensity of their pain. In this qualitative study, we interviewed 39 individuals with EDS in order to investigate how experiencing doubt from clinicians impacted their self-perceptions of pain. Contrary to the claim that pain is a purely private phenomenon, our participants' experiences were mediated by social dynamics related to epistemic and power asymmetries. These asymmetries affected their willingness to acknowledge their pain to others, to judge it against the experiences of those whom they considered biomedically "normal," and even to discount the reality of their pain experience. In analyzing these findings, we examine the discursive and intersubjective forces that shape the experience of chronic pain in this population and argue for the expansion of the biopsychosocial model to include these sociogenic processes by which patients rearticulate and reconceptualize their pain to match clinical expectations of "normal" symptoms.

Indexed as

Chronic painClinician doubtEhlers-Danlos syndromesPatient-provider interactionSocial power dynamicsSubjectification

Identifiers

PMID42433476
PMCPMC13353488

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.