ReviewRSC advances2026
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) for nonlinear optical properties: design principles, DFT insights, and future directions for photonic applications.
Review in RSC advances, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Engineering metal-organic framework-based smart porous nanoplatforms for targeted therapy and theranostic applications.Smart molecules : open access · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) have emerged as a uniquely versatile platform for nonlinear optical (NLO) applications, combining the large hyperpolarizabilities of organic chromophores with the chemical robustness and structural programmability of crystalline porous materials. Although many reviews have covered various facets of MOF-NLO chemistry, no review has brought together structural design principles, family-to-family quantitative performance comparisons, and DFT-based hyperpolarizability evaluations within a unified critical framework. This review of NLO properties of MOFs is considered through three interconnected facets: the principles of structural design to achieve non-centrosymmetric, high-second and third-order response structures; computational tools based on density functional theory (DFT) to predict and rationalize the electronic and optical properties of MOFs; and the measurement tools such as Z-scan and two-photon excited fluorescence (TPEF). The particular focus is on triphenylamine (TPA)-based MOFs, with their multi-branched donor-π-acceptor structure and robust intramolecular charge transfer (ICT) features rendering them the most promising third-order NLO materials. They provide externally tunable third-order responses (
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.