Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433389›Full record

SynthesisPeerJ2026

A systematic review of locust phase polyphenism: from proximate mechanisms to ecology and management.

Diriba Fufa Serdo, Zoltán Németh

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PeerJ, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Diriba Fufa SerdoDepartment of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0003-3266-7160
Zoltán NémethDepartment of Evolutionary Zoology and Human Biology, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary.ORCID 0000-0001-6164-9952

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Locust phase polyphenism is a remarkable example of phenotypic plasticity, driven by population density to produce a dramatic shift between cryptic, solitarious and swarming, gregarious phenotypes. Despite over a century of research, the evidence base lacks systematic synthesis. We conducted a systematic review of 400 studies on locust phase polyphenism, integrating evidence across ecological, neurobiological, physiological, molecular, epigenetic, and microbial drivers. The results revealed that the evidence base is constrained by two critical limitations. First, severe taxonomic narrowness: 93.8% of studies focus on at least one of two model species (desert locust,

Indexed as

GrasshoppersPhenotypeAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsEcologyClimate changeField-laboratory integrationGut microbiomeLocust phase changeMolecular mechanismsPhase polyphenismPhenotypic plasticitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID42433389
PMCPMC13353236

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.