ArticleFrontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare2026
Implementing virtual diabetes self-management education in two health systems (VIDA): a mixed-methods pilot study.
Article in Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Introduction: Group-based diabetes self-management education (DSME) has long been shown to improve health outcomes, but how to effectively adapt these programs to virtual settings in diverse healthcare systems remains unclear. Utilizing the RE-AIM implementation framework, this mixed-methods pilot study evaluated the feasibility, benefits, and challenges of implementing virtual group DSME for adults with Type 2 diabetes mellitus in two distinct systems: a federally qualified health center and a private, not-for-profit health system. Methods: Adults with elevated glycosylated hemoglobin (A1c) levels and at least one cardiovascular comorbidity were invited to participate in six monthly 60- to 90-minute online group education sessions led by diabetes educators. Sessions focused on disease and lifestyle education, peer support, and structured goal setting. Quantitative data captured patient recruitment, attendance, and engagement metrics. Semi-structured interviews with patients, providers, and staff explored perceived benefits, barriers, and implementation experiences. Results: Of 97 eligible patients, 50 were reached and 11 enrolled, with 10 completing at least one session. Participants had an average age of 63.5 years old, were 90% African American and 80% female, and had an average A1c of 8.7% (SD 0.7). The average attendance rate was 3.6 (SD 1.9) sessions. The most frequent reasons for declining enrollment in the study were competing responsibilities and stating they did not need additional diabetes education, while accessing technology was rarely a limiting factor. Participants reported high satisfaction with the program, emphasizing the value of shared experiences, increased accountability, improved disease knowledge, and convenience of attending virtually from home. Providers and staff viewed the sessions as a valuable adjunct to clinical care that reinforced behavioral goals beyond the limits of brief primary care visits. Reported challenges included scheduling conflicts with patients and mistrust in medical advice. The intervention demonstrated strong fidelity to implementing the treatment design and curriculum, with most patients successfully formulating goals related to exercise and blood glucose monitoring. Discussion: This study provides initial evidence that virtual group DSME can be feasible, well-received, and adaptable across different healthcare environments. It provides initial evidence in understanding how technology-enabled group models can deliver chronic disease education in different health system contexts while empowering self-management in diverse urban populations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.