Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433290›Full record

ArticleComputing in cardiology2025

Classification of the Source of 1D Doppler Ultrasound Activity in Fetal Monitoring.

Johann Vargas-Calixto, Rachel Beanland, Reza Sameni, Nasim Katebi, Sh Anice Reynolds, Suchitra Chandrasekaran, Peter Rohloff, Sunil Sazawal, Saikat Deb, Sayan Das and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computing in cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Johann Vargas-CalixtoEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Rachel BeanlandMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.
Reza SameniEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Nasim KatebiEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Sh Anice ReynoldsEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Suchitra ChandrasekaranEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Peter RohloffMaya Health Alliance, Tecpán, Guatemala and Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Sunil SazawalCenter for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Saikat DebCenter for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Sayan DasCenter for Public Health Kinetics, New Delhi, India.
Gari D CliffordEmory University, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Faezeh MarzbanradMonash University, Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

AI-driven low-cost ultrasound for automated quantification of hypertension, preeclampsia, and IUGRR01HD110480 · NICHD · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Gari David Clifford · 2022 to 2026
$3.1M
Pediatric and Reproductive Environmental Health Scholars Southeastern Environmental Exposures and Disparities (PREHS SEED) ProgramK12ES033593 · NIEHS · EMORY UNIVERSITY · PI Linda A. McCauley · 2022 to 2026
$2.4M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD110480NIEHS NIH HHS K12 ES033593
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Cardiotocography and obstetric ultrasound imaging are the standard for fetal monitoring during pregnancy and labor. These technologies are often expensive and, with very few exceptions, can only be used by highly trained personnel. Medical care during gestation differs in low- to middle-income countries (LMIC) from high-income countries. Our research has previously demonstrated that a low-cost 1D Doppler ultrasound (DUS) can be used during pregnancy to assess maternal and fetal health. However, differentiation between DUS signals from the fetal heart (FH) and umbilical cord (UC) can be challenging for untrained users. Methods: We trained a random forest classifier to detect whether 1D DUS recordings originated from FH activity or UC blood flow. This classifier was trained using the relative energy in each 10 Hz interval of the power spectrum derived from a balanced set of recordings. We used leave-one-out cross-validation to test our results. Results: We achieved an area under the curve of 0.82 and an accuracy of 75% for identifying FH activity, and 84% for UC blood flow. Conclusions: It is possible to differentiate the source of the 1D Doppler ultrasound signal. Depending on the source, different clinical parameters can be analyzed, enabling more targeted assessments of maternal and fetal health.

Identifiers

PMID42433290
PMCPMC13353517

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.