ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026
Biliary drainage plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus biliary drainage plus best supportive care for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in China: a prospective multicentre non-randomised controlled study.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: In most patients with advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), multi-branch biliary involvement results in inadequate jaundice relief despite biliary drainage. Together with recurrent cholangitis, persistent fever, impaired liver function, and poor performance status, these factors often preclude standard systemic treatment. We conducted a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised controlled study to evaluate whether a treatment pathway incorporating hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) after biliary drainage was associated with clinical outcomes in this treatment-limited population. Methods: This prospective, multicentre, non-randomised controlled study enrolled systemic-treatment-naïve participants with pathologically confirmed advanced pCCA at five tertiary centres in China between November 1, 2021, and July 5, 2024. Key eligibility criteria included absence of distant metastases or N2 disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1, and Child-Pugh score ≤7; key exclusion criteria included prior systemic treatment, uncontrolled infection, and severe organ dysfunction. Participants received biliary drainage followed by HAIC (BD + HAIC) or biliary drainage plus best supportive care (BD + BSC). HAIC consisted of oxaliplatin 40 mg/m Findings: A total of 127 participants were enrolled (63 BD + HAIC; 64 BD + BSC). Median OS was 17.63 months in the BD + HAIC group and 6.10 months in the BD + BSC group (P < 0.0001). Jaundice remission occurred in 93.7% versus 46.9% of participants (P < 0.0001). Median DJR was 12.67 months versus 4.50 months (P < 0.0001). Adverse events were generally manageable; haematological and gastrointestinal events were more frequent with BD + HAIC, whereas elevated total bilirubin was more frequent with BD + BSC. Grade 3-4 events were uncommon, and no treatment-related deaths were observed. Interpretation: Biliary drainage followed by HAIC was associated with longer survival and more durable jaundice remission than biliary drainage plus best supportive care in a treatment-limited population with advanced pCCA. Given the non-randomised design, lack of a contemporary systemic-therapy control arm, and risk of selection bias and unmeasured confounding, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating only and not evidence of a causal treatment effect. Randomised studies comparing BD + HAIC with appropriate contemporary systemic therapy are required to determine its clinical benefit in this setting. Funding: This study was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.