Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433279›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2026

Biliary drainage plus hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy versus biliary drainage plus best supportive care for advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma in China: a prospective multicentre non-randomised controlled study.

Yuyang Dai, Song Wang, Jian Gao, Yaqin Wang, Xiangyu Yang, Shuo Zhang, Xin Zhi, Kanglian Zheng, Liang Xu, Guang Cao and 7 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Yuyang DaiKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Song WangInterventional Medicine Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Jian GaoDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Yaqin WangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Intervention, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China.
Xiangyu YangDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shuo ZhangInterventional Medicine Center, The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University, Qingdao, China.
Xin ZhiDepartment of Radiology, Peking University People's Hospital, Beijing, China.
Kanglian ZhengKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Liang XuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Guang CaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Baocai XingKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Hepatic & Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Kun WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Hepatic & Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Chunyi HaoKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Hepatic & Biliary Surgery, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Xu ZhuKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.
Dr Yuewei ZhangDepartment of Hepatobiliary Intervention, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Beijing, China.
Dr Kun GaoDepartment of Interventional Radiology, Beijing Chao-yang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Dr Xiaodong WangKey Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Interventional Therapy, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In most patients with advanced perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA), multi-branch biliary involvement results in inadequate jaundice relief despite biliary drainage. Together with recurrent cholangitis, persistent fever, impaired liver function, and poor performance status, these factors often preclude standard systemic treatment. We conducted a prospective, multicentre, non-randomised controlled study to evaluate whether a treatment pathway incorporating hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) after biliary drainage was associated with clinical outcomes in this treatment-limited population. Methods: This prospective, multicentre, non-randomised controlled study enrolled systemic-treatment-naïve participants with pathologically confirmed advanced pCCA at five tertiary centres in China between November 1, 2021, and July 5, 2024. Key eligibility criteria included absence of distant metastases or N2 disease, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-1, and Child-Pugh score ≤7; key exclusion criteria included prior systemic treatment, uncontrolled infection, and severe organ dysfunction. Participants received biliary drainage followed by HAIC (BD + HAIC) or biliary drainage plus best supportive care (BD + BSC). HAIC consisted of oxaliplatin 40 mg/m Findings: A total of 127 participants were enrolled (63 BD + HAIC; 64 BD + BSC). Median OS was 17.63 months in the BD + HAIC group and 6.10 months in the BD + BSC group (P < 0.0001). Jaundice remission occurred in 93.7% versus 46.9% of participants (P < 0.0001). Median DJR was 12.67 months versus 4.50 months (P < 0.0001). Adverse events were generally manageable; haematological and gastrointestinal events were more frequent with BD + HAIC, whereas elevated total bilirubin was more frequent with BD + BSC. Grade 3-4 events were uncommon, and no treatment-related deaths were observed. Interpretation: Biliary drainage followed by HAIC was associated with longer survival and more durable jaundice remission than biliary drainage plus best supportive care in a treatment-limited population with advanced pCCA. Given the non-randomised design, lack of a contemporary systemic-therapy control arm, and risk of selection bias and unmeasured confounding, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating only and not evidence of a causal treatment effect. Randomised studies comparing BD + HAIC with appropriate contemporary systemic therapy are required to determine its clinical benefit in this setting. Funding: This study was supported by the Beijing Natural Science Foundation, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China.

Indexed as

Biliary drainageHepatic arterial infusion chemotherapyJaundice remissionOverall survivalPerihilar cholangiocarcinoma

Identifiers

PMID42433279
PMCPMC13352030

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.