ArticleLiver cancer2026
Selective Conventional Transarterial Chemoembolization Using a Glass Membrane Emulsification Device in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Multicenter Clinical Trial in Japan.
Article in Liver cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The aim of the study was to evaluate the complete response (CR) rate achieved with selective conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) using a porous glass membrane emulsification device in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: In a multicenter phase II trial (jRCTs052200095) conducted between January 2021 and June 2023, 50 patients with unresectable HCC (tumor diameter ≤5 cm; Child-Pugh A or B) were enrolled. An emulsion of epirubicin and ethiodized oil (Lipiodol) prepared using the emulsification device was injected into the tumor-feeding arteries, followed by embolization with gelatin sponge particles. The primary endpoint was the CR rate at 3 months post-treatment. Secondary endpoints included the CR rate at 1 month and the incidence of adverse events. Outcomes were compared with a historical control cohort from the JIVROSG-1302 study in exploratory analyses. Results: Two patients were excluded after enrollment, leaving 48 patients who received cTACE (safety set). An additional 3 patients were excluded post-treatment, yielding 45 patients for efficacy analysis. The CR rate at both 1 month and 3 months was 97.8% (95% confidence interval: 88.2-99.9%). Serious adverse events (grade ≥3) included elevated AST in 50.0% of patients, elevated ALT in 29.2%, thrombocytopenia in 2.1%, and elevated ALP in 2.1%. The proportion of patients with deterioration in ALBI grade (≥1 grade increase) at 3 months was 17.8%. In exploratory analyses, CR rates were numerically higher than those observed in the historical control. Conclusion: Selective cTACE using a W/O emulsion prepared with a glass membrane pumping emulsification device was associated with high short-term CR rates in patients with HCC, with an acceptable safety profile. These findings support further clinical investigation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.