ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026
Development and validation of a dual-attention deep learning prediction model for noninvasive differentiation of pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma from inflammatory pulmonary nodules.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (PIMA) is a rare subtype of lung adenocarcinoma that often mimics benign inflammatory pulmonary nodules (IPNs) on chest computed tomography (CT), leading to diagnostic challenges. We aimed to develop and internally validate a deep learning (DL)-based prediction model for noninvasive differentiation of PIMA from IPN. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 443 patients with pathologically confirmed PIMA or IPN between January 2021 and December 2023. The reference standard was postoperative histopathology. A total of 1,409 CT slices were used for model development. The dataset was randomly divided at the patient level into training (80%) and validation (20%) cohorts for internal validation. A dual-attention deep learning model (SE-DAS ResNet) integrating spatial and channel-wise attention mechanisms was developed. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as well as accuracy and F1 score. Results: In the internal validation cohort, the SE-DAS ResNet achieved an AUC of 0.990 (95% CI: 0.978-1.000), an accuracy of 96.6%, a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 90.7-100%), and a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI: 84.1-98.4%). The model significantly outperformed a standard ResNet50 baseline (AUC 0.914, P<0.05). An online research platform was developed to facilitate real-time inference. Conclusions: This dual-attention DL prediction model demonstrated excellent performance for differentiating PIMA from IPN on CT images. However, the reliance on an 80/20 internal random split rather than independent external validation may lead to optimistic performance estimates. External validation in independent multicenter cohorts is required to confirm generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.