Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42433254›Full record

ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026

Development and validation of a dual-attention deep learning prediction model for noninvasive differentiation of pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma from inflammatory pulmonary nodules.

Jiading Xie, Shiqing Wang, Junjie Cheng, Qizheng Wei, Haitang Yang, Feng Yao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jiading Xie *Department of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shiqing Wang *Department of Radiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Junjie ChengDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Qizheng WeiDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Haitang YangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Feng YaoDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, Shanghai Chest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9635-9581

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (PIMA) is a rare subtype of lung adenocarcinoma that often mimics benign inflammatory pulmonary nodules (IPNs) on chest computed tomography (CT), leading to diagnostic challenges. We aimed to develop and internally validate a deep learning (DL)-based prediction model for noninvasive differentiation of PIMA from IPN. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 443 patients with pathologically confirmed PIMA or IPN between January 2021 and December 2023. The reference standard was postoperative histopathology. A total of 1,409 CT slices were used for model development. The dataset was randomly divided at the patient level into training (80%) and validation (20%) cohorts for internal validation. A dual-attention deep learning model (SE-DAS ResNet) integrating spatial and channel-wise attention mechanisms was developed. Model performance was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and specificity with their 95% confidence intervals (CIs), as well as accuracy and F1 score. Results: In the internal validation cohort, the SE-DAS ResNet achieved an AUC of 0.990 (95% CI: 0.978-1.000), an accuracy of 96.6%, a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 90.7-100%), and a specificity of 94.1% (95% CI: 84.1-98.4%). The model significantly outperformed a standard ResNet50 baseline (AUC 0.914, P<0.05). An online research platform was developed to facilitate real-time inference. Conclusions: This dual-attention DL prediction model demonstrated excellent performance for differentiating PIMA from IPN on CT images. However, the reliance on an 80/20 internal random split rather than independent external validation may lead to optimistic performance estimates. External validation in independent multicenter cohorts is required to confirm generalizability.

Indexed as

computed tomography (CT)deep learning (DL)dual-attention networkinflammatory pulmonary nodule (IPN)Pulmonary invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma (PIMA)

Identifiers

PMID42433254
PMCPMC13351947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.