ArticleTranslational lung cancer research2026
Ultrasound assessment of pleural invasion via visceral pleura interruption and arch distance-to-tumour diameter ratio in a rabbit model of subpleural lung cancer.
Article in Translational lung cancer research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pleural invasion of lung cancer is an adverse factor for treatment and prognosis but difficult to assess during clinical staging. We investigated the feasibility of assessing the arch distance-to-perpendicular tumour diameter ratio (A/Dper; "per" stands for perpendicular diameter) and visceral pleura interruption on ultrasound (US) images for evaluating pleural invasion in lung cancer models. Methods: The lung cancer model was constructed in thirty rabbits. The length of the interface between the primary tumour and neighbouring structures and the tumour diameters were measured on US images. The integrity of the visceral and parietal pleura was observed. The pathological tissue was evaluated with elastic tissue staining and hematoxylin and eosin staining. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to assess the ratios. The diagnostic efficacy of the ratios and pleural interruption were calculated. Results: The cut-off value of A/Dper for distinguishing PL3 from PL2 tumours was 1.55, with the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy and the area under the ROC curve of 100.0%, 87.5%, 92.9%, and 0.979, respectively. Evaluation of the continuity of the visceral pleura on US images revealed 12 of the 13 (92.3%) PL0+1 tumours and 12 of the 14 (85.7%) PL2 or PL3 tumours. The combination of them for evaluating pleural invasion achieved an excellent consistency between the pathological and US results. Conclusions: Visceral pleura interruption and A/Dper on US images are potential indications for evaluating pleural invasion, and should be further validated in more clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.